This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Neighbor News

Opinion: The Truth About Fairfield's Housing Issues (And Who is Really Responsible)

It took a Republican-controlled TPZ Commission 24 years — and a court order — to get the affordable housing moratorium Fairfield has today.

It's a popular trend to look around town and blame "Democrats" and "Hartford" for the many developments currently being constructed. This isn't true.

While affordable housing should never be a partisan issue, our local Republicans are doing nothing to correct this misperception; in many cases, they are even perpetuating a false narrative. Here's the truth: Republicans controlled the Fairfield TPZ Commission for 25 years. The State of Connecticut passed the 8-30g moratorium provisions in 2000. Fairfield achieved its first-ever moratorium in December 2024. This means it took the Republican-controlled Commission 24 of those 25 years to get the moratorium Fairfield is currently enjoying. But the Republican-led TPZ Commission did not achieve that moratorium through careful planning. It was, ironically, court-approved 8-30g developments and naturally occurring affordable housing the town had deed-restricted that finally pushed Fairfield over the threshold. In other words, Fairfield's current moratorium was achieved in spite of, not because of, the Republican-led TPZ Commission.

During those 24 years, the Town of Fairfield was flooded with 8-30g applications, and the developments generating the most concern and controversy came about during that same period of Republican leadership. Among them: the scheduled demolition and redevelopment on Unquowa Road near the Community Theater, which many Fairfielders are lamenting. This and other projects are a direct result of decades of inadequate planning under Republican leadership.

Find out what's happening in Fairfieldfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

A quarter-century of inaction is precisely why the current Commission voted to add additional monthly planning sessions: to do more of the planning work it's supposed to be doing. Interestingly, the objections to those additional sessions came solely from the two Republican TPZ commissioners.

All of these facts are a matter of public record.

Find out what's happening in Fairfieldfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?